The trouble with the Junos

I’d like to get some things off my chest here.

The nominees for the 2009 Juno Awards were announced the other day, and with every year, CARAS adds another nail to its own coffin. It’s hard to see why the Junos are still such a big deal in Canada — their relevance seems to slip away more and more every year, and we are left honouring artists who write lyrics like this:

Dirty little lady with the pretty pink thong
Every sugar daddy hitting on her all night long
Doesn’t care about the money, she could be with anybody
Ain’t it funny how the honey wanted you all along!

[...] You’re so much cooler when you never pull it out
‘Cause you look so much cuter with something in your mouth

That’s right. Nickelback, the ones responsible for that atrocity, led the nominations parade with five (single, album, artist and producer of the year, as well as the fan choice award). Somehow, CARAS seem to think that this motley crew is the best thing this country has to offer musically. If this is the case, I’d like to change my citizenship.

I’ll come back to that, but first, there’s another problem we need to pay attention to: the “International Album of the Year” category, this year a contest between AC/DC, Coldplay, Guns ‘N Roses, Jack Johnson, and Metallica. First of all: none of these people give a rat’s behind whether they’re nominated for a Juno Award (an award ostensibly for Canadian content, I might add). Second, why do we even need this category? Obviously, Chris Martin or Axl Rose are not going to show up to the ceremony, so it isn’t even a ploy to boost ratings. This category has been a head-scratcher for me ever since I started watching the Junos and I still haven’t been able to justify it.

If the Juno Awards really do need a category like this, they need to make it relevant to Canada. Albums that sell more than any Canadian record are not a good enough connection. We’ve got categories for best producer and recording engineer, many of whom work on albums by non-Canadian artists; this is the kind of thing that should be getting more attention, not a gratuitous presentation to an artist who will probably forget they got the award at all.

I could get into a lot more (why is there only one Francophone category? How in the hell does a throat singer get nominated for instrumental album of the year?), but I’d like to go back to the Nickelback problem for a moment.

Here it is, plain and simple: Nickelback shouldn’t be on this pedestal. Most of Canada has no idea what’s going on in most of music, and assume that when you turn on the top 40 station, that’s all there is. The only two categories that really honour Canada’s incredible artistic scene are also terribly named, almost cursory ones: Alternative and Adult Alternative albums of the year.

What is “adult alternative”? When I hear that, I think Muzak. According to the Juno nominees sheet, though, it means Hawksley Workman, Serena Ryder, Kathleen Edwards, Ron Sexsmith and Sarah Slean — all incredibly talented musicians, and ones who would probably belong in a category titled “Songwriter of the Year”. Alternative, by contrast, contains Black Mountain, Chad VanGaalen, Fucked Up, Plants and Animals, and The Stills.

I’m sure most of you are thinking the same thing: why are Nickelback, Simple Plan, Hedley, and Celine Dion all over the nominations list, and why are our most talented artists getting the boot?

The answer is, of course, record sales. Nickelback sell more albums than any of these artists, and I suppose they deserve to be rewarded for that. That really doesn’t mean they also wrote the best single that came out this year, nor that they’re the best artist Canada saw in 2008; it does mean, though, that the Juno Awards are clearly not focused enough on artistic merit. Nickelback have a lot of fans, but I find it difficult to believe that Dark Horse would hold up with every judge on the Juno Award panel when put against last year’s records by Sam Roberts, Hawksley, Sloan, Chad VanGaalen … you get my drift.

Many of the artists nominated do deserve it, and I’m glad that they’re getting the recognition. However, I think that the Juno Awards need to take a leaf from the Polaris Music Prize’s book and reward actual artistic merit, not just record sales. The best things coming out of Canada aren’t the ones you’re going to hear on Top 40 radio or the ones necessarily selling the best — because no one is bold enough to play them. Once this country realises how narrow the field they’re working with is, maybe these awards will be relevant again. Until then, we’re stuck with Chad Kroeger: an embarrassment to this country.

Juno Awards home
Complete list of nominees (PDF)
Sloan vs. Nickelback — The Battle of the Bands!

Tags: ,

4 Comments

  1. Adam said,

    February 9, 2009 at 6.26pm

    I agree with you completely about the “International” award. It seems like they are competing with the Grammy’s on that one. 3 American Bands, a British Band and an Australian/British band, hardly a great swath of international music. They are leaving entire continents out.

    It seems like big committees like that are always in the dark as to what is really happening in the world.

    The Polaris Prize, I feel, is much more coveted a prize and bands that are nominated deserve it, and the winners are always humble and get a great boost from it. Thankfully there is nothing artistic about a band such as Nickelback, and the Polaris can be the real prize, whereas the Juno can remain the front page news.

  2. cinchel said,

    February 9, 2009 at 10.51pm

    yeah..in some way this is why i stopped watching the grammy’s. its not really a awards show as much as its a dog and pony show for the RIAA et al to parade around the bands that they sold well to the ppl. its kinda sick. i think it was neat that radiohead played and brought a big marching band but i would have found it cooler had they told the grammys to stuffit.

    so the juno’s are even more pathetic as they are trying to copy a lame american show. i think that these awards committees and shows are really hurting and in a few years will be obsolete. i mean thinks move way to fast now for us to think about stuff that came out a year ago.

    now the polaris…that seems to have kept its finger on the pulse..giving final fantasy an award for “leaving home” ..way before he poos clouds comes out and the blog hype explodes. and they gave one to patrick watson for an amazing record…one that NO ONE HERE knows about. and he hasnt toured here either….maybe the polaris is a bit to far ahead. i look forward to what they pick this year!

  3. barbara said,

    February 10, 2009 at 12.37pm

    You’re preaching to the choir here. I too am perennially perplexed as to the difference between adult and adult alternative. Perhaps they are referring to lifestyle choice, but I doubt it.

    What really horrifies me is that people actually buy Nickelback albums. However, music lovers generally ignore the Junos as being a Grammys clone (which by the way could not be saved even with the presence of Radiohead and MIA) and pay attention to Polaris or even the Buckys!

  4. toomuchcountry said,

    February 18, 2009 at 10.54pm

    Corb Lund, Corb Lund, Corb Lund. He should win ‘em all. The best thing to come out of western Canada since Pamela Anderson!

Post a Comment